Skip Navigation


CESifo Economic Studies Advance Access originally published online on June 18, 2007
CESifo Economic Studies 2007 53(2):329-361; doi:10.1093/cesifo/ifm012
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
53/2/329    most recent
ifm012v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gérard, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Related Collections
Right arrow H32 - Firm
Right arrow H73 - Interjurisdictional Differentials and Their Effects
Right arrow H87 - International Fiscal Issues; International Public Goods
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Ifo Institute for Economic Research, Munich. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Reforming the Taxation of Multijurisdictional Enterprises in Europe*

Marcel Gérard{dagger}

{dagger} ARPEGE/FUCaM, Catholic University of Mons, Belgium and Cesifo, e-mail: gerard{at}fucam.ac.be

In 2001, the European Commission proposed replacing the current system of taxation of multinational companies by the taxation of a consolidated base, computed at the level of all the European entities of a multinational enterprise, and then distributed for taxation purposes among the various jurisdictions in which these entities operate, according to pre-established criteria. In this article, we propose a discussion, especially focusing on two related issues, the choice of the formula and the composition of the consolidating area—either the entire European Union (EU) or some Member States within an Enhanced Cooperation Agreement—, as well as on their impact on the size and distribution of tax revenue and economic activity, and on the intensity of tax competition. Our tentative policy conclusion is that the reform deserves support provided that (i) the formula puts emphasis on criteria that the firm may not too easily manipulate, (ii) the activities of the multijurisdictional enterprise are enough mobile, (iii) the consolidation is made compulsory within the consolidating area and (iv) the consolidating area protects its capacity to actually levy tax by adopting a crediting system vis-à-vis the rest of the world. (JEL code: H32, H73, H87)

Key Words: multinational enterprises • multinational companies • European taxation • tax consolidation • tax competition


* This article is based on a research started in the fall of 2004 at the Office of Tax Policy Research of the University of Michigan and completed during stays at Queen's University, Kingston, Ont., and CESifo, Munich, made possible of a grant from the Belgian Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique and the generosity of CESifo. The stimulating hospitality of Robin Boadway as well as valuable suggestions and comments by Thiess Buettner, Carola Maggiuli, Alexander Klemm, Matthias Mors, Nicole Prieur, Jean-Pierre Vidal, Frans van Istendael and anonymous referees are gratefully acknowledged.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.